A commercial office building exterior. Editorial setting only. No company signage.

tenant rep analysis

How should tenant-rep analysis be framed?

How should tenant-rep analysis be framed?

Tenant-rep analysis is a client story: what the space must do, what the cash is, what can flip, and what you still do not know. It is not a CRM record and not a finished software product.

The page belongs to a validation / pilot concept. It is not generally available.

See the Tenant-Rep Workflow

Questions people ask next

How should a broker explain economics?

A tenant-rep broker should place cash, time, and risk in a short lease story a client can trust and forward.

How do you compare LOIs?

An LOI is a sketch. A broker should rebuild each lease sketch as cash before anyone names a winner.

What belongs in the memo?

The memo should place the pick, the gap, the rate, the extras, the risks, and the next lease ask.

How do you compare stay versus move?

A stay-versus-move compare should add move cost and downtime to the relocation lease path before ranking. A tenant should keep this lease answer visible on the same page.

Read How do you compare commercial LOIs? when you need the next deep answer.

Read What belongs in a lease recommendation memo? when you need the next deep answer.

Read How do you compare a renewal versus a relocation? when you need the next deep answer.

How do you compare commercial LOIs? · What belongs in a lease recommendation memo? · How do you compare a renewal versus a relocation?

Plain-language definition

Tenant-rep work is representing the occupier, not the landlord.

The analysis is the compare plus the fit plus the open risks.

NPV means net present value. It is one exhibit in that story.

A brokerage CRM stores people and stages. It does not finish this exhibit.

Empty conference room used as editorial background. Not a customer photo.

Why it matters

Clients pay for judgment, not a thicker spreadsheet.

A clear packet saves a second meeting.

A muddy packet creates a third meeting.

This hub exists so the packet can stay short and honest.

How it works

The cash flow is the list of money in and out by year. Write that list first.

  • Open with the use, then the cash, then the flip tests, and end with leftovers.
  • Keep sample math labeled as samples.
  • Do not claim customers or results this site does not have.
  • Point to the pilot if they want to try the workflow.
Later cash boxes sit farther right and look smaller than year-one cash.
Later cash is smaller in today's dollars. This is a teaching picture, not a live model.

Formula in words. Story = fit + occupancy cash + sensitivity + leftovers.

Required inputs for this page
InputMeaning
UseWhat the team must do in the space
CashRent, extras, credits
TestsWhat can flip
UnknownsWhat is still missing

Worked example

Here is a teaching sample. It is not customer data and not a result from a live client.

Lease A start rent$40,500
Lease B start rent$37,665
Discount rate8%
Sample NPV A$368,002
Lease A vs Lease B — the client-packet lease
MetricLease ALease B
Start rent$40,500$37,665
Year-1 extras$9,100$9,737
Year-1 credit$7,000$3,850
Sample NPV$368,002$354,323
Cash-flow walk — the client-packet lease
YearRentExtrasCreditCash outValue today
Year 1$40,500$9,100$7,000$42,600$39,444
Year 2$41,715$9,373$0$51,088$43,800
Year 3$42,966$9,654$0$52,620$41,771
Year 4$44,255$9,944$0$54,199$39,838
Year 5$45,583$10,242$0$55,825$37,994
Year 6$46,950$10,549$0$57,499$36,234
Year 7$48,359$10,865$0$59,224$34,557
Year 8$49,810$11,191$0$61,001$32,957
Year 9$51,304$11,527$0$62,831$31,431
Year 10$52,843$11,873$0$64,716$29,976
Sample NPV$368,002
Two bars on one scale for Lease A and Lease B. Teaching sample only.
Both options use the same rate. The lower bar is not automatically the better lease.

How to read the sample

Sample NPV for the client-packet lease is about $368,002. A second path lands near $354,323. That gap is a talking point, not a promise.

A client can follow year one if you speak in cash, not slogans. If one path wins only because a credit sat in the wrong year, start over.

Year notes for the client-packet lease

  • Year 1 of the client-packet lease has rent of $40,500.
  • Shared building cost is $9,100.
  • A credit of $7,000 lowers the cash you pay that year.
  • Cash out this year is about $42,600. A client can follow year one if you speak in cash, not slogans.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 1 is worth about $39,444 today.
  • Next, year 2 rent is $41,715.
  • CAM, which is a shared building cost, is $9,373.
  • There is no credit in this year.
  • You pay about $51,088 this year after extras and credits. Extras show up in the story here.
  • Time shrinks later cash. At 8 percent, year 2 is worth about $43,800 today.
  • Then year 3 rent is $42,966.
  • Extras for the building come to $9,654.
  • Credits skip this year.
  • The net cash this year is about $52,620. Steps need a sentence in this year.
  • Waiting has a price. At 8 percent, year 3 is worth about $41,771 today.
  • After that, year 4 rent is $44,255.
  • The shared building cost this time is $9,944.
  • No extra credit shows up this year.
  • Cash out this year is about $54,199. Mention the rate in the same breath here.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 4 is worth about $39,838 today.
  • In year 5 of the client-packet lease, rent is $45,583.
  • Shared building cost is $10,242.
  • There is no credit in this year.
  • You pay about $55,825 this year after extras and credits. The sample path closes on this last taught year.
  • Time shrinks later cash. At 8 percent, year 5 is worth about $37,994 today.
  • Year 6 of the client-packet lease has rent of $46,950.
  • CAM, which is a shared building cost, is $10,549.
  • Credits skip this year.
  • The net cash this year is about $57,499. Keep this later year in the sum for the sample.
  • Waiting has a price. At 8 percent, year 6 is worth about $36,234 today.
  • Next, year 7 rent is $48,359.
  • Extras for the building come to $10,865.
  • No extra credit shows up this year.
  • Cash out this year is about $59,224. The row still belongs in the sum for the long path.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 7 is worth about $34,557 today.
  • Then year 8 rent is $49,810.
  • The shared building cost this time is $11,191.
  • There is no credit in this year.
  • You pay about $61,001 this year after extras and credits. Keep this later year in the sum for the long path.
  • Time shrinks later cash. At 8 percent, year 8 is worth about $32,957 today.
  • After that, year 9 rent is $51,304.
  • Shared building cost is $11,527.
  • Credits skip this year.
  • The net cash this year is about $62,831. The row still belongs in the sum for the long path.
  • Waiting has a price. At 8 percent, year 9 is worth about $31,431 today.
  • In year 10 of the client-packet lease, rent is $52,843.
  • CAM, which is a shared building cost, is $11,873.
  • No extra credit shows up this year.
  • Cash out this year is about $64,716. Keep this later year in the sum for the long path.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 10 is worth about $29,976 today.

Add those year values. The sample NPV for the client-packet lease is about $368,002. This is a teaching sample, not a client result.

Read the broker explainer

Assumptions

  • No general availability is claimed.
  • Pricing on this site is a hypothesis.

Edge cases

A CFO packet is shorter than an analyst workbook.

A first tour packet can omit NPV if cash is not ready.

Common mistakes

  • Leading with software features.
  • Hiding unknowns.
  • Treating a CRM note as analysis.

Decision implications

If the client can repeat the story, the packet worked.

If they only remember 'lower rent,' the packet failed.

Compare this to related metrics

A CRM is a pipeline tool.

A spreadsheet can be the engine if the story stays clear.

Limits

  • This is a validation surface, not a launch claim.

When this should not drive the choice

  • Do not force a finance packet on a tour that has no offers yet.

Next step

This site is a validation / pilot concept. It is not generally available. Payment is not collected.

Request Pilot Access

How should a tenant-rep broker explain lease economics to a client?

Trusted sources

These are public references. They are not endorsements and not client results.

  1. U.S. BLS — real estate brokers
  2. NAIOP
  3. U.S. Census Bureau — County Business Patterns