Two hypotheses are being tested: $290 per year for professional access, or $149 per deal comparison report. Selecting an option indicates interest. Payment is not collected. Willingness to pay is not yet proven.
These prices are being tested because tenant-rep brokers currently rebuild a workbook deal by deal. Face rent, a separate tab, and separate emails are the current method. The hypothesis is that a focused workflow for compare commercial lease economics — cash-flow and NPV without rebuilding the spreadsheet — is worth a bounded annual or per-deal amount. That is not a claim that anyone already pays these prices.
Professional annual access
$290 / year
Intended for tenant-rep and boutique CRE brokers who would use a focused comparison workspace across deals. The hypothesis includes access to the proposed cash-flow compare, NPV + sensitivity, and client summary workflow if the product is built. It does not include a CRM, lease administration, or a finished product today.
Per-deal comparison report
$149 / deal
Intended for occasional use. The hypothesis includes one comparison report if the product is built. It does not include unlimited seats, a start free trial, or checkout on this page.
Why pricing is being tested
This is a pilot context. The hidden cell cost of rebuilding a workbook is real; whether brokers will pay $290 or $149 is not proven. Payment is not collected. A selection is an interest signal only.
Who should not use it
Who is this not for: not for landlords, not for property managers, and not for teams that need enterprise lease admin. It is also not for anyone who expects a finished product or believes a lower NPV is automatically the better lease.
Who is this not for
who is this not for: this workflow is not for landlords running a portfolio, not for property managers administering occupied buildings, and not for teams that need a full brokerage suite. It is also not for anyone who wants a finished product with checkout today.
Objections worth answering now
This is not a finished product. Payment is not collected on this site. A lower NPV is not automatically the better occupancy choice. Sample figures are illustrative and are not customer results.