A commercial office building exterior. Editorial setting only. No company signage.

lease comparison

How should you compare commercial leases?

How should you compare commercial leases?

A fair compare is one timeline, the same extras, the same start idea, and the same discount rate. Then read the rank with the things the math cannot see.

The page belongs to a validation / pilot concept. It is not generally available.

Compare Your Lease Options

Questions people ask next

How do you compare two offers?

A lease compare places both offers on one timeline, adds extras and credits, then discounts the cash at one rate.

How do you normalize proposals?

Normalization converts every lease offer to the same unit before a tenant ranks the options or requests a counter.

How do you compare gross and net?

A net lease should include tenant-paid extras first so the rent sticker does not pretend to be the whole bill.

What belongs on the sheet?

Dates, rent, extras, credits, options, and the rate should sit on one lease sheet before anyone names a winner.

Read How do you normalize commercial lease proposals? when you need the next deep answer.

Read How do you compare a gross lease and a net lease? when you need the next deep answer.

Read What belongs in a commercial lease comparison? when you need the next deep answer.

Read How do tenant-rep brokers compare lease offers? when you need the next deep answer.

How do you normalize commercial lease proposals? · How do you compare a gross lease and a net lease? · What belongs in a commercial lease comparison? · How do tenant-rep brokers compare lease offers?

Plain-language definition

A lease comparison is a fair side-by-side of occupancy cash.

Fair means the same costs are in or out for each option.

NPV means net present value. It is one way to finish the compare after the timeline is honest.

Face rent is the loud line. It is not the whole compare.

Empty conference room used as editorial background. Not a customer photo.

Why it matters

Landlords write offers in different shapes on purpose.

Free rent, TI money, and steep steps can hide inside a pretty first year.

A client deserves one picture, not three PDFs with different units.

Brokers lose time when the compare lives in five tabs.

How it works

The cash flow is the list of money in and out by year. Write that list first.

  • Collect rent, extras, credits, term, and start.
  • Line up commencement so year one means the first occupied year.
  • Place free rent and TI money in the year they happen.
  • Discount with one visible rate. Share a short summary.
Later cash boxes sit farther right and look smaller than year-one cash.
Later cash is smaller in today's dollars. This is a teaching picture, not a live model.

Formula in words. Same cash rules + same rate + same occupancy window = a comparable NPV pair.

Required inputs for this page
InputMeaning
Rent pathStart rent and steps
ExtrasCAM, tax, insurance
CreditsFree rent and TI
WindowTerm and start

Worked example

Here is a teaching sample. It is not customer data and not a result from a live client.

Lease A start rent$36,000
Lease B start rent$33,480
Discount rate8%
Sample NPV A$347,504
Lease A vs Lease B — Option One
MetricLease ALease B
Start rent$36,000$33,480
Year-1 extras$11,000$11,770
Year-1 credit$12,000$6,600
Sample NPV$347,504$339,029
Cash-flow walk — Option One
YearRentExtrasCreditCash outValue today
Year 1$36,000$11,000$12,000$35,000$32,407
Year 2$37,260$11,330$0$48,590$41,658
Year 3$38,564$11,670$0$50,234$39,877
Year 4$39,914$12,020$0$51,934$38,173
Year 5$41,311$12,381$0$53,692$36,542
Year 6$42,550$12,752$0$55,302$34,850
Year 7$43,827$13,135$0$56,962$33,237
Year 8$45,142$13,529$0$58,671$31,698
Year 9$46,496$13,935$0$60,431$30,231
Year 10$47,891$14,353$0$62,244$28,831
Sample NPV$347,504
Two bars on one scale for Lease A and Lease B. Teaching sample only.
Both options use the same rate. The lower bar is not automatically the better lease.

How to read the sample

Sample NPV for Option One is about $347,504. A second path lands near $339,029. That gap is a talking point, not a promise.

Credits make year one look kind. If one path wins only because a credit sat in the wrong year, start over.

Year notes for Option One

  • Year 1 of Option One has rent of $36,000.
  • Shared building cost is $11,000.
  • A credit of $12,000 lowers the cash you pay that year.
  • Cash out this year is about $35,000. Credits make year one look kind.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 1 is worth about $32,407 today.
  • Next, year 2 rent is $37,260.
  • CAM, which is a shared building cost, is $11,330.
  • There is no credit in this year.
  • You pay about $48,590 this year after extras and credits. The real bill shows up when credits end.
  • Time shrinks later cash. At 8 percent, year 2 is worth about $41,658 today.
  • Then year 3 rent is $38,564.
  • Extras for the building come to $11,670.
  • Credits skip this year.
  • The net cash this year is about $50,234. Steps keep lifting the later years.
  • Waiting has a price. At 8 percent, year 3 is worth about $39,877 today.
  • After that, year 4 rent is $39,914.
  • The shared building cost this time is $12,020.
  • No extra credit shows up this year.
  • Cash out this year is about $51,934. A second option may look worse now and better later.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 4 is worth about $38,173 today.
  • In year 5 of Option One, rent is $41,311.
  • Shared building cost is $12,381.
  • There is no credit in this year.
  • You pay about $53,692 this year after extras and credits. The compare is about the whole path.
  • Time shrinks later cash. At 8 percent, year 5 is worth about $36,542 today.
  • Year 6 of Option One has rent of $42,550.
  • CAM, which is a shared building cost, is $12,752.
  • Credits skip this year.
  • The net cash this year is about $55,302. Keep this later year in the sum for the sample.
  • Waiting has a price. At 8 percent, year 6 is worth about $34,850 today.
  • Next, year 7 rent is $43,827.
  • Extras for the building come to $13,135.
  • No extra credit shows up this year.
  • Cash out this year is about $56,962. The row still belongs in the sum for the long path.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 7 is worth about $33,237 today.
  • Then year 8 rent is $45,142.
  • The shared building cost this time is $13,529.
  • There is no credit in this year.
  • You pay about $58,671 this year after extras and credits. Keep this later year in the sum for the long path.
  • Time shrinks later cash. At 8 percent, year 8 is worth about $31,698 today.
  • After that, year 9 rent is $46,496.
  • Shared building cost is $13,935.
  • Credits skip this year.
  • The net cash this year is about $60,431. The row still belongs in the sum for the long path.
  • Waiting has a price. At 8 percent, year 9 is worth about $30,231 today.
  • In year 10 of Option One, rent is $47,891.
  • CAM, which is a shared building cost, is $14,353.
  • No extra credit shows up this year.
  • Cash out this year is about $62,244. Keep this later year in the sum for the long path.
  • Later cash gets a shrink for time. At 8 percent, year 10 is worth about $28,831 today.

Add those year values. The sample NPV for Option One is about $347,504. This is a teaching sample, not a client result.

See a worked comparison

Assumptions

  • Two options would use this same table shape.
  • The sample is office-like. Industrial uses the same idea with different extras.

Edge cases

Different start dates need a shared first occupied month.

Renewal rights are extra cases.

Expansion rights are extra cases too.

A second city adds labor and tax, not just rent.

Common mistakes

  • Comparing rent per foot while one deal is gross and one is net.
  • Leaving free rent off the cheap-looking offer.
  • Using different rates so the favorite wins.

Decision implications

If the cheaper NPV also fits, the cash case is clean.

If it does not fit, keep the cash and say the fit problem.

Compare this to related metrics

A CRM stores contacts. It does not finish this compare.

A spreadsheet can do it if the rules stay visible.

Limits

  • This hub does not run your live file.
  • It is a validation teaching surface.

When this should not drive the choice

  • Do not compare a 3-year stay to a 15-year stay without saying the extra years are extra years.

Trusted sources

These are public references. They are not endorsements and not client results.

  1. NAIOP
  2. BOMA
  3. Investopedia — net present value